California’s Climate Change Policies: Lessons for the Nation

Climate change is a real and urgent threat to our communities, our states, and our nation. California is already experiencing its impacts. Over the past 100 years, the Golden State has seen a seven-inch rise in sea level, eroding our coastal communities and threatening critical infrastructure. In the winter, more of our precipitation now falls as rain rather than snow, leading to less water availability in the critical spring and summer months. California has already experienced a more severe and prolonged wildfire season. These effects are merely a small window into the issues that California faces with a changing climate.

I. Introduction
II. The Imperative of State Climate Action
1. Exercise of a State’s Police Powers to Protect Public Health and Its Natural Resources
2. Exercise of the State’s Policy Prerogative: Laboratory of Democracy
3. Future National Climate Policy Framework: A Federal-State-Local Partnership
III. California’s Model of Policy Development: Leadership, Cross-Agency Engagement, and Stakeholder Involvement
1. Efforts by California’s State Agency Climate Action Team
2. Stakeholders: Local Governmental Agencies, Industry, NGOs and Individuals
IV. Multiple Challenges, Multiple Tools
1. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s Climate Change Executive Orders
2. California’s Assembly Bill 32 Framework: Markets and Mandates
3. California’s Upcoming Development of a Cap-and-Trade Program
3. Set a Specific, Declining Cap
V. California’s Climate Change Lessons for the Nation
1. Demonstrate Clear and Determined Leadership
2. Act Now
3. Set a Specific, Declining Cap
4. Engage Government and the Private Sector at All Levels and in All “Silos”
VI. Conclusion



Copyright: © Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH
Quelle: Issue 2/2010 (Juni 2010)
Seiten: 7
Preis inkl. MwSt.: € 41,65
Autor: Mary D. Nichols

Artikel weiterleiten In den Warenkorb legen Artikel kommentieren


Diese Fachartikel könnten Sie auch interessieren:

The Role of Renewables in the Interaction between Climate Change Policy and Energy Security in Europe
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (7/2010)
After decades of hesitation, there is now growing concensus among European Union (EU) member states that European energy policy objectives can best be achieved at the EUlevel, with climate change policy already having led to a degree of energy policy harmonisation at the expense of member state autonomy.

US Federal Energy and Climate Change legislation: Some Lessons to be Learned from the Waxman-Markey Bill
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (6/2010)
This article analyzes the Waxman-Markey Bill to identify lessons to be learned from past efforts to pass US federal energy and climate change legislation. Overall, the message is that Presidential leadership will be necessary to pass such legislation, which is currently facing both stiff resistance from special interests and complacency from the public. The case for action has to be put more convincingly. One argument that deserves greater attention is that the economic costs of doing nothing are potentially high for important sectors of the U.S. economy. Delaying legislation could leave companies from the United States lagging behind their competitors in the growing global market for new low-carbon services and technologies.

EEG-Novelle auf dem Prüfstand
© HAWK Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaft und Kunst - Fakultät Ressourcenmanagement (10/2014)
Der folgende Vortrag beschäftigt sich mit der Fragestellung, in wie weit das am 01.08.2014 in Kraft getretene EEG 2014 verfassungsrechtlich zu beanstanden ist. Dabei werden folgende Schwerpunkte gesetzt: das zügige Inkrafttreten sowie zu kurz bemessene Übergangsfristen des EEG 2014, die Begrenzung der förderfähigen Strommenge bei bestehenden Biogasanlagen und die Einbeziehung der Eigenversorgung in die EEG-Umlage.

Wie viel kostet Strom wirklich?
© HAWK Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaft und Kunst - Fakultät Ressourcenmanagement (10/2014)
Die so genannte Energiewende von einer fossil-atomaren zu einer überwiegend bis ausschließlich aus erneuerbaren und weitestgehend CO2-freien Energieträgern bestehenden Energieversorgung ist auf Grund des Klimawandels und des nicht akzeptablen Risikos der Atomkraft zwingend erforderlich. In diesem Zusammenhang wird von Gegnern immer wieder argumentiert, dass die Energiewende nicht finanzierbar wäre, da erneuerbarer Strom zu teuer sei.

Shaping the Electricity Market of the Future
© SRU - Sachverständigenrat für Umweltfragen (11/2013)
Climate-neutral electricity generation is both necessary and possible. It is necessary because the Federal Republic of Germany, together with the other Member States of the European Union, has committed itself to the target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by at least 80 per cent from 1990 levels by 2050. This is the industrialised countries’ minimum contribution to the internationally agreed target of preventing global average temperature from rising more than 2°C above pre-industrial levels. This target can only be achieved by moving to a power system essentially based on renewable sources, as substantial emission reductions are easier and less expensive to implement in the electricity sector than in other sectors.

Name:

Passwort:

 Angemeldet bleiben

Passwort vergessen?

Der ASK Wissenspool
 
Mit Klick auf die jüngste Ausgabe des Content -Partners zeigt sich das gesamte Angebot des Partners
 

Selbst Partner werden?
 
Dann interessiert Sie sicher das ASK win - win Prinzip:
 
ASK stellt kostenlos die Abwicklungs- und Marketingplattform - die Partner stellen den Content.
 
Umsätze werden im Verhältnis 30 zu 70 (70% für den Content Partner) geteilt.
 

Neu in ASK? Dann gleich registrieren und Vorteile nutzen...