| 2025 | |
| EurUp 02/2025 | |
| Eurup 01/2025 | |
| 2024 | |
| 2023 | |
| 2022 | |
| 2021 | |
| 2020 | |
| 2019 | |
| 2018 | |
| 2017 | |
| 2016 | |
| 2015 | |
| 2014 | |
| 2013 | |
| 2012 | |
| 2011 | |
| 2010 | |
| 2009 | |
| 2008 | |
| 2007 | |
| 2006 | |
| 2005 | |
| 2004 | |
Rechte der Natur oder Rechte für die Natur in der EU?
An ecocentric concept of separate, enforceable rights of nature for the EU, as has already been enshrined in positive law for the Mar Menor in Spain, offers some advantages for reducing the considerable deficits in environmental protection, but also encounters legal and political limits.
The rights of nature go further than existing EUenvironmental law, both in terms of content and in their procedural dimension. In particular, a more consistent application of the ‘in dubio pro natura’ rule could improve the balancing result in favour of environmental protection. The more effective enforceability of nature's rights is not necessarily dependent on nature's legal subjects. It can also be realised through legal action on behalf of nature, in particular by NGOs and individuals. In order to ensure efficient legal protection in this respect, the state procedural regulations must not excessively restrict access to the court, and in particularmust notmake legal standing exclusively dependent on the assertion of specific private rights or interests. While the legal standing of environmental organisations is now well developed due to the Aarhus Convention and the case law of the ECJ, the legal protection of individuals remains unsecured for example in Germany in order to avoid popular actions. The underlying separation of general and individual interests is questionable in environmental protection. A mediating solution could be a procedural subjective human right to a healthy environment.
| Copyright: | © Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH | |
| Quelle: | EurUp 02/2025 (Juni 2025) | |
| Seiten: | 18 | |
| Preis inkl. MwSt.: | € 32,00 | |
| Autor: | ||
Artikel weiterleiten  | In den Warenkorb legen
| Artikel kommentieren |
Diese Fachartikel könnten Sie auch interessieren:
Projektverbund ForCYCLE II zur Steigerung der Ressourceneffizienz in der bayerischen Wirtschaft
© Lehrstuhl für Abfallverwertungstechnik und Abfallwirtschaft der Montanuniversität Leoben (12/2024)
Ziel des Projektverbundes ForCYCLE II zur Steigerung der Ressourceneffizienz in der bayerischen Wirtschaft war die Entwicklung von Lösungsansätzen und Technologien im Bereich der Ressourceneffizienz und der Kreislaufwirtschaft, insbesondere für KMU und Handwerksbetriebe.
Substances of Concern in Ecodesign and Other EU Law
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (10/2024)
A New Layer of Chemicals Management for Environmental Sustainability
(Geschützte) natürliche Lebensräume als Gegenstand eines Umweltschadens
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (6/2024)
The article concerns the question of whether environmental liability under EU law for damage to natural habitats is limited to designated protected areas of the Natura 2000 network or whether such habitats outside protected areas are also covered. It examines thewording and structure of the Environmental Liability Directive and comes to the conclusion that the provisions of the directive are designed for natural habitats in protected areas and cannot be applied to habitats outside of them.
Sustainability Agreement among Competitors
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (3/2024)
New Guidance from the EU and UK
Die Beteiligung von Naturschutzvereinigungen und Naturschutzbeiräten in Genehmigungsverfahren
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (11/2023)
Grenzfragen der §§ 66 Abs. 2 und 70 Abs. 2 LNatSchG NRW
