The Concept of Unsafe Food – A Critical Reflection on the Tenet of EU Food Law

The most fundamental notion underlying ten years of reform of EU food safety law has been codified in Article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) 178/2002: Food shall not be placed on the market if it is unsafe. This notion has been elaborated in most of the rest of EU food law, first and foremost in the other paragraphs of Article 14. This contribution analyses Article 14 and argues in favour of a text-conform interpretation.

Ten years of General Food Law and of reconstruction of food law in the EU inspire me to zoom in on the provision I consider containing the hard core of food law; its very essence so to speak: the ban in placing unsafe food on the market. Most of the rest of food law elaborates on this basic notion. This rest deals with questions such as: What distinguishes safety from risk? What must be done to achieve the objectives of safety? Who has which responsibilities in the case of … Et cetera.
This ban is enshrined in Article 14(1) of Regulation 178/2002 (the co-called General Food Law – hereinafter: GFL) stating:
 
Article 14(1) GFL ‘Food shall not be placed on the market if it is unsafe.’
 
In this contribution, I want to take the analysis back to the literal text of the provision. Much has been written on the meaning of Article 14 GFL some of which seems difficult to reconcile with the text of the provision. This does not necessarily mean that such interpretations are incorrect, but interpretations that advocate a meaning departing from the text should at least be based on some other solid reasoning.
My research question is straightforward: what is the essence of Article 14 GFL; that is to say: what are the conditions for application of the different rules contained in Article 14 GFL, and what are the consequences that this application entails?
To answer this question, I will confront my reading of the text with the interpretations proposed by others. I will not address all the scattered sources and opinions. The three most important systematic comments on the General Food Law that I am aware of are the Guidance on the Implementation of Articles 11, 12, 14, 17, 18, 19 and 20 of Regulation (EC) N° 178/2002 on General Food Law, of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health (SCFCAH) and two books in German language: Alfred Hagen Meyer and Rudolf Streinz, LFBG – BasisVO; Kommentar (the comment on Article 14 is by Meyer) and Dietrich Gorny, Kommentar Basis-Verordnung (EC) No. 178/2002. Grundlagen des europäischen Lebensmittelrechts.



Copyright: © Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH
Quelle: StoffR 05/2012 (Oktober 2012)
Seiten: 7
Preis inkl. MwSt.: € 25,00
Autor: Prof. Dr. Bernd M.J. van der Meulen
Artikel weiterleiten In den Warenkorb legen Artikel kommentieren

Diese Fachartikel könnten Sie auch interessieren:

Reporting of food waste in the EU – Results of current estimates in Germany
© Lehrstuhl für Abfallverwertungstechnik und Abfallwirtschaft der Montanuniversität Leoben (11/2020)
In February 2019, the German Federal Cabinet adopted the 'National Strategy for Reducing Food Waste', setting a framework for the future direction of this initiative. Among other things, it stipulated that an inter-ministerial "Indicator 12.3 Working Group" should prepare the data bases and methods for nationwide balancing of food waste generation (baseline). Based on existing 2015 data, this status quo analysis will be used as a starting point to agree on milestones for the respective sectors.

Circular economy from an SDG perspective: A multi-stakeholder process for developing policy options
© Lehrstuhl für Abfallverwertungstechnik und Abfallwirtschaft der Montanuniversität Leoben (11/2020)
Based on a longitudinal case study (the UniNEtZ project in Austria), which includes a multi-stakeholder involvement, we investigate the process of developing CE policies for the Austrian Federal Government from an SDG perspective. Within this context, the main research question is how multi-stakeholder processes can enable the development of CE policy options. The study thus contributes to providing a structured approach of how different stake-holders from academia, industry, research funding agencies and government collaborate, how knowledge is created and transferred within this multi-stakeholder process, and what outputs, outcomes and impacts can be realized at the national level in the context of developing CE policies using an SDG framework.

The circular packaging design guideline and holistic sustainability assessment in circular economy
© Lehrstuhl für Abfallverwertungstechnik und Abfallwirtschaft der Montanuniversität Leoben (11/2020)
The FH Campus Wien Circular Packaging Design Guideline provide recommendations for circular design for the whole supply chain. Circular design is a necessary prerequisite to achieve the goals of the European Circular Economy Package which requires full recyclability of packaging by 2030. Circular packaging should re-duce resource consumption and environmental impacts of packaging. The assessment of packaging sustainability requires the calculation of direct and indirect environmental impacts and circularity at the same time. A method for holistic sustainability assessment of packaging has been proposed by FH Campus Wien and developed in an ECR-working group (Efficient Consumer Response) with the participation of a number of companies along the whole supply chain (brand owners, retailers, packaging manufacturers and packaging systems).

LIFE: Das Umwelt-Förderprogramm der EU – ein Überblick über ein Finanzierungsinstrument mit breitem Themenspektrum
© Springer Vieweg | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH (8/2019)
Seit über 25 Jahren fördert die EU im Rahmen des LIFE-Programms Projekte des Umwelt- und Klimaschutzes. Das Finanzierungsinstrument hat zum Ziel, umweltfreundliche, innovative Produkte, Verfahren und Dienstleistungen sowie Best Practice in Europa zu etablieren und die entsprechende Politik und Verwaltungspraxis weiterzuentwickeln. Es unterstützt Vorhaben aus vielen Bereichen wie Arten- und Biotopschutz, biologische Vielfalt, Klimaanpassung, Luftqualität, Kreislaufwirtschaft, Chemikalien, Lärm – und nicht zuletzt Wasser- und Abfallwirtschaft. Historie, Schwerpunkte und Besonderheiten von LIFE sowie Projektbeispiele werden vorgestellt.

Aktuelle Entwicklungen im europäischen und nationalen Deponierecht
© Universität Stuttgart - ISWA (3/2019)
Warum befassen wir uns heute noch mit neuen Regelungen und Entwicklungen von Deponien, einer so genannten „end-of-pipe-Technologie“? Bereits 1999 wurde darüber diskutiert, dass 2020 keine Deponien mehr erforderlich sein würden. Dies beruhte allerdings auf einer missverstandenen Äußerung des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt im Zusammenhang mit der Einführung der mechanisch-biologischen Abfallbehandlung.

Name:

Passwort:

 Angemeldet bleiben

Passwort vergessen?

Der ASK Wissenspool
 
Mit Klick auf die jüngste Ausgabe des Content -Partners zeigt sich das gesamte Angebot des Partners
 
Selbst Partner werden?
 
Dann interessiert Sie sicher das ASK win - win Prinzip:
 
ASK stellt kostenlos die Abwicklungs- und Marketingplattform - die Partner stellen den Content.
 
Umsätze werden im Verhältnis 30 zu 70 (70% für den Content Partner) geteilt.
 
Neu in ASK? Dann gleich registrieren und Vorteile nutzen...