Regulatory Governance of Credit Rating Agencies in the EU: The Perils of Pursuing the Holy Grail of Rating Accuracy
This paper argues that the EU Regulation of credit rating agencies is concurrently pursuing two objectives that conflict with and would undermine each other. One is the objective of enhancing rating accuracy, and the other is the objective of restoring market discipline in the wholesale investment markets for credit ratings as information goods. The Regulation places more emphasis on regulating for rating accuracy which has the effect of instituting a form of product regulation for credit ratings, raising the public interest profile of credit ratings. This paper argues that this is undesirable and is contrary to policy-makers’ endeavours to enhance market discipline for rating quality and the private accountability of credit rating agencies. EU policy-makers would eventually need to confront the underlying conflicting objectives in the Regulation so that a normatively coherent and consistent regulatory regime can be designed and implemented.
Credit rating agencies play an important part in securities and bond markets as they provide information signals to investors, assisting and even replacing investor due diligence. Coffee has described the credit rating agencies’ role as a gatekeeper, providing an information service to facilitate market-based discipline in the securities markets. In the wake of the global financial crisis, credit rating agencies’ inflated ratings for sub-prime structured products were called into question and the EU quickly decided to regulate them. The EU Regulation on Credit Rating Agencies was one of the earlier pieces of reform legislation passed in September 2009 pursuant to the de Larosière report. When the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) was formally established in end 2010, amendments were made to the Regulation in order to designate ESMA as the European Securities Markets Authority for credit rating agencies, undertaking the role of registration and approval, standard-setting and ongoing supervision and enforcement, replacing a fragmentary coordinated approach to registration, supervision and enforcement undertaken by a college of national supervisors. This young Regulation is now subject to another round of prospective reforms.
The global financial crisis has been partly attributed to the flawed quality of credit ratings concerning complex collaterised debt obligations rated by credit rating agencies. The overly exuberant market for structured products, which collapsed in the financial crisis, was supported by overly optimistic ratings issued for the products and investors’ unquestioning reliance on such ratings. Excessive reliance on credit ratings by investors exposed a problem of failure of market discipline for credit ratings. The problem of flawed credit ratings could be attributed to a number of factors including perverse incentives on the part of credit rating agencies.
The EU Regulation addresses both of the problems mentioned above. However, in doing so, the Regulation produces the following effects: The Regulation on the one hand desires to diminish the public interest profile of credit ratings so that excessive reliance on them would not be encouraged; but on the other hand provides a legal framework which would likely increase the public interest profile of credit ratings by enhancing rating accuracy. This paper discusses both aspects of the Regulation, the essential conflict between pursuing both objectives and the choice that policy-makers should make
| Copyright: | © Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH | |
| Quelle: | Issue 02/2013 (Juni 2013) | |
| Seiten: | 18 | |
| Preis inkl. MwSt.: | € 41,65 | |
| Autor: | Iris H-Y Chiu  | |
| Artikel weiterleiten | In den Warenkorb legen
| Artikel kommentieren |
Diese Fachartikel könnten Sie auch interessieren:
Zur Rechtsprechung des EuGH im Umweltrecht im Jahr 2023
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (8/2024)
Die in der diesjährigen Übersicht über die umweltrechtliche Rechtsprechung des EuGH berücksichtigten Urteile aus dem Jahr 2023 betreffen folgende Themata: Rechtsschutz (II.), Zugang zu Umweltinformationen (III.), Umweltverträglichkeitsprüfung (IV.), Industrieemissionen und Luftreinhaltung (V.), Klimaschutz (VI.), Gefahrstoffrecht (VII.), Abfallrecht (VIII.) und Naturschutzrecht (IX.).
LIFE: Das Umwelt-Förderprogramm der EU – ein Überblick über ein Finanzierungsinstrument mit breitem Themenspektrum
© Springer Vieweg | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH (8/2019)
Seit über 25 Jahren fördert die EU im Rahmen des LIFE-Programms Projekte des Umwelt- und Klimaschutzes. Das Finanzierungsinstrument hat zum Ziel, umweltfreundliche, innovative Produkte, Verfahren und Dienstleistungen sowie Best Practice in Europa zu etablieren und die entsprechende Politik und Verwaltungspraxis weiterzuentwickeln. Es unterstützt Vorhaben aus vielen Bereichen wie Arten- und Biotopschutz, biologische Vielfalt, Klimaanpassung, Luftqualität, Kreislaufwirtschaft, Chemikalien, Lärm – und nicht zuletzt Wasser- und Abfallwirtschaft. Historie, Schwerpunkte und Besonderheiten von LIFE sowie Projektbeispiele werden vorgestellt.
New Waste-to-Energy Facility Energy Works Hull, United Kingdom
© Thomé-Kozmiensky Verlag GmbH (9/2016)
Energy Works Hull (the Project) is a milestone project for the UK’s waste and renewable energy sector. It will be one of the largest gasification facilities receiving MSW in the UK, indeed in Europe. It is one of the first advanced conversion technology Projects to receive its renewable electricity subsidies through a Contract for Difference, the mechanism by which the UK Government determined to move from Renewable Obligation Certificates following its Electricity Market Reform process. It also plays a significant part of the urban regeneration of the City of Hull. The level of community engagement and benefit has resulted in the project receiving a GBP19.9M grant from the European Union’s Regional Development Fund.
Zur Rechtsprechung des EuGH im Umweltrecht im Jahr 2014
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (3/2015)
Die imfolgenden Beitrag berücksichtigtenUrteile des EuGH aus dem Jahr 2014 betreffen folgende Themata: Auslegung der Aarhus-Konvention bzw. der zu ihrer Umsetzung ergangenen unionsrechtlichen Vorschriften (II.), Umweltinformation (III.), Fragen des „nationalen Alleingangs“ (IV.), finanzielle
Sanktionen (V.), Naturschutzrecht (VI.), Klimaschutz und Energierecht (VII.), Gewässerschutz (VIII.) und Luftreinhaltung (IX.).
The Coolsweep Project - establishing common resources across borders within the field of waste-to-energy
© Lehrstuhl für Abfallverwertungstechnik und Abfallwirtschaft der Montanuniversität Leoben (11/2014)
Waste poses a major problem area as well as a great business potential in countries throughout the globe. Therefore, cross-regional collaboration between leading companies, universities, and public authorities is not only necessary to overcome problems of environmental degradation and pollution; it is also good business for everyone.
The Coolsweep project aims to support the development of these cross-regional partnerships by establishing research driven collaboration between leading European stakeholders within waste-to-energy. The project partners include five major European cleantech cluster organisations, two universities and one cluster analysis organisation deriving from Italy, Spain, Denmark, Austria, Norway, and Latvia.
