Rio+20 and the ‘Green Economy’

Im Juni 2012 trafen sich Regierungsvertreter, Organisationen und Unternehmen zur Konferenz der Vereinten Nationen über nachhaltige Entwicklung in Rio de Janeiro, Brasilien, um erneut über die Zukunft unseres Planeten zu beraten. Im Mittelpunkt der kurz „Rio+20“ genannten Konferenz standen Diskussionen um die „Green Economy“ im Kontext nachhaltiger Entwicklung und Armutsbekämpfung sowie die institutionellen Rahmenbedingungen nachhaltiger Entwicklung. Die verfasste Abschlusserklärung enthielt dann jedoch nicht die erhofften Wegweisungen, so dass diese Konferenz wohl eher eine von symbolischem Charakter bleibt.
Der vorliegende Artikel gibt zunächst einen kurzen Überblick über die bisher, seit 1972 durchgeführten Gipfeltreffen. Er beleuchtet dann den Begriff der „Green Economy“ eingehender, der auf der Rio+20 Konferenz erstmals aufgegriffen wurde. Obwohl der Begriff nicht näher definiert wurde und viel Raum für rechtliche Diskussionen schafft, erscheint der Ansatz selbst jedoch realistisch. Dennoch, trotz aller Bemühungen der Nationen auf dem Wege zu einer gemeinsamen nachhaltigen Entwicklung lassen die unterschiedlichen Interessen eine noch lang anhaltende Debatte voraussagen.

The ‘United Nations World Summit on Sustainable Development’ held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, from 13 to 22 June 2012, was the opportunity specifically geared towards the needs of humanity and its responsibility for what has been caused in the planet by human activities. It brought together 188 countries, including more than 100 heads of state or government, to discuss ‘How do we manage to live sustainably in the future without leading our planet to self-destruction, and how the world can grow economically, lifting people out of poverty and preserve the environment’.

About 45.400 participants attended the summit, raising expectations that were subverted because of the multiplicity of interests pursued by the different countries. Such interests often conflict and often these were and continue to be, motivated by policies protecting the self-interest of certain countries thereby undermining their credibility in international negotiations.

A variety of procedures, ambitious and credible targets, which inevitably produce contradictions, were taken into account. These may prove fruitful in terms of providing a deeper understanding of our world’s difficulties, such as: desertification, salinization, loss of biodiversity, rising water shortages, and many others problems caused from the effects of human activities in the environment. However, in spite of all difficulties, the mission was never deemed to be impossible. As Rio+20 was not set up as a conference on ecology or environment, the topics of climate change, CO2 emissions and biodiversity were not the specific subject-matter, but the background of it. It is to say, how these topics can affect the environmental pillar in the context of sustainable development.

Thus, this article will offer a short overview of the background to the UN Summits over the last forty-year period, plus some associated information concerning the recent Summit held in Rio de Janeiro.

Insofar as the Rio+20 addressed the ‘reen economy’, which was completely new concerning the new development model rather than merely ‘economy’, this article includes certain points that are still open for further legal debates. The intention here is to cover some significant developments of the UN World Summits up to Rio+20, and endeavours to point out some issues for discussions rather than to present a solution. In such a large and expanding topic it is impossible to be quite comprehensive, because there is much more that could be said on everything. Hence, this article remains primarily a report of the conference, approached from the generalist perspective.

Copyright:	© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH
Quelle:	EurUp 04/2012 (August 2012)
Seiten:	4
Preis inkl. MwSt.:	€ 32,00
Autor:	Maria Goretti Sanches Lima, LL.M.

Artikel weiterleiten	In den Warenkorb legen	Artikel kommentieren

Diese Fachartikel könnten Sie auch interessieren:

Market-based Instruments for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in Brazil: Experiences and Prospects
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (12/2012)
Brazil has become an increasingly important participant in the discussion about climate change, combining an active role in climate diplomacy with credible domestic policy efforts. Market-based instruments have featured prominently in its domestic policy landscape, with carbon markets envisioned both at the federal and regional level. Aside from successful participation in the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and some progress in the creation of voluntary offset markets, however, the pathway towards a domestic carbon market has so far been fraught by delays and ongoing uncertainty. Still, Brazil can build on proven institutional structures, quantified emissions limitation targets, and new rules on the collection of emissions data and sectoral mitigation plans to establish robust market-based instruments. A carbon market can help leverage its vast mitigation potential to abate greenhouse gas emissions at sufficient scale while limiting the cost of compliance for domestic entities. Given its unique emissions profile, however, Brazil should not focus on becoming a net seller of carbon credits or allowances to foreign entities, but should instead harness the opportunity to create an ambitious, welldesigned market and thereby become a leader on climate change mitigation in Latin America.

A Green Emerging Market: India’s Experiments with Market Based Mechanisms for Climate Mitigation
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (12/2012)
India is the fourth largest emitter of greenhouse gases in the world. After Copenhagen in 2009, India announced that it will be working to reduce voluntarily the carbon intensity of its emissions by 20–25 % against 2005 levels by the year 2020, while maintaining a growth rate of 8 %. In 2011–2012, it introduced a number of innovative initiatives to help reach that goal. This paper will discuss three of these measures. Two of these schemes are market based initiatives in the field of energy: the first is called “Perform, Achieve and Trade” and is aimed at improved energy efficiency; the second scheme promotes increased use of renewable sources of energy through trade in renewable energy certificates. The third scheme is a pilot market based emissions trading mechanism that seeks to reduce the levels of particulate matter emissions in three leading industrial states in India.

Emissions Trading around the World: Dynamic Progress in Developed and Developing Countries
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (12/2012)
Drawing on a series of forthcoming case studies developed under a joint project of the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) and the International Emissions Trading Association (IETA), this article conveys the dynamic bottom-up progress on emissions trading systems (ETS) around the world. The case studies will provide an easily accessible tool that facilitates the analysis of ETS based on examples from existing and developing policies. Each of the 18 case studies provides an overview of the history on climate action within the specified jurisdiction, highlights ongoing challenges and unique features, and describes key ETS elements. The jurisdictions of focus lie within both developed and developing parts of the world, and the set of case studies encompasses multinational-, national-, regional-, state/provincial-, and city-scale jurisdictions. This article summarizes the key design features and differentiating aspects of ETS development in each jurisdiction. While designs vary, each ETS described ultimately belongs to the same category of quantity-based market mechanism.

New Market Mechanisms: Prerequisites for Implementation
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (12/2012)
The Durban climate conference decided to establish a new market-based mechanism (NMM) that is to cover broad segments of countries’ economies. This article aims to explore the essential prerequisites for the implementation of an NMM. In addition to a theoretical discussion it considers the cases of China and Mexico. The article finds that the challenges in establishing market mechanisms that cover a broad segment of the economy are formidable and most developing countries have serious capacity constraints. Lead times can be expected to be at least 3–5 years. To move the process forward, it may be useful to consider promoting pilot activities similar to the Activities Implemented Jointly pilot phase that preceded the introduction of the flexible Kyoto mechanisms and the demonstration activities for Reducing Emissions from Avoided Deforestation and Forest Degradation.

The Influence of Chinese Climate Policy & Law on Africa
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (12/2010)
The economic influence of China on Africa has been apparent for some time, has this influence spread into the sphere of climate policy and law? This article considers the development and implementation of Chinese climate change policy and law and whether lessons can be drawn from the Chinese experience and be effectively applied to African countries. The analysis is made against the backdrop of development in China and Africa, Chinese development efforts and co-operation with African countries, and takes into account the wide differences in the levels of economic and social development of those countries.