Exploring Uncertainties in the EU ETS: “Learning by Doing” Continues Beyond 2012
The Commission proposal amending the EU greenhouse gas emissions trading scheme (EU ETS) was delivered hardly five years after adoption of the EU ETS Directive. The amendment of the EU ETS agreed upon politically in December 2008 strives for substantial emission reductions by 2020, and entails fundamental shifts in terms of harmonization of allocation mechanisms, large scale auctioning, and treatment of exposed sectors.
The amendment of the EU ETS agreed on in December 2008 will see covered entities face new challenges. Due to a more stringent overall reduction target, the emissions trading regime will have a larger influence on the business sector. The basic question “who can get, under what conditions, tradable allowances” will thus be even more relevant than in the initial regime. This paper sheds light on possible uncertainties that industries might face following the new allocation provisions. Both regulatory uncertainty and “business uncertainty” regarding the price to be paid for allowances serve as starting points. By nature, business uncertainty is much more prevalent in the event of auctioning compared to free allocation, which seems to encompass larger regulatory uncertainty, especially for the possible exposed sectors. Moreover, the article highlights the difficulty of designing allocation mechanisms, and some of the complexities that might arise in the course of a trading period. Of particular note is that it cannot be excluded that the executive regulations for auctioning and free allocation need to be amended in order to ensure the intended outcome of the scheme. In this sense, the learning by doing period has not ended at all. The article concludes that, from a governance perspective, any legislator should incorporate the question of regulatory and business uncertainty when introducing emissions trading schemes or major amendments to such schemes. In fact, environmental effectiveness could have also been achieved with the current emissions trading scheme if the Commission had conducted a sufficiently strict inspection of the national allocation plans. For protecting the climate and for ensuring an emission reduction of 20 percent in 2020, the fundamental review was not, in fact, a strict necessity. The trade-off of developing a suitable framework for a level playing field and avoiding windfalls in the context of emissions trading is that industries need to face new regulatory approaches, for which it is not yet completely clear how they will affect their business activities.
| Copyright: | © Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH | |
| Quelle: | Issue 1/2009 (April 2009) | |
| Seiten: | 14 | |
| Preis inkl. MwSt.: | € 41,65 | |
| Autor: | Marjan Peeters  Dr. Stefan Weishaar | |
| Artikel weiterleiten | In den Warenkorb legen
| Artikel kommentieren |
Diese Fachartikel könnten Sie auch interessieren:
Emissionshandel – Entwicklungen der zweiten Handelsperiode und Bedeutung für die Abfallwirtschaft
© TK Verlag - Fachverlag für Kreislaufwirtschaft (6/2009)
Das Europäische Parlament und der Europäische Rat beschlossen 2003, die im Kyoto-Protokoll festgelegten Emissionsminderungsverpflichtungen der Europäischen Union (EU) und ihrer Mitgliedsstaaten zu einem wesentlichen Teil mit Hilfe eines Emissionshandelssystems für Kohlendioxid auf Unternehmensebene zu erfüllen. Um das Emissionshandelssystem möglichst ohne ökonomische Verwerfungen einzuführen, wird der größte Teil der zur Verfügung stehenden Emissionsberechtigungen nach festgelegten Regeln in den Mitgliedsstaaten kostenlos vergeben.
Transboundary Transportation of CO2 Associated with Carbon Capture and Storage Projects: An Analysis of Issues under International Law
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (1/2009)
The central proposition of this paper is that transboundary CO2 transportation associated with Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) projects is potentially regulated, or in some cases even prohibited,
under certain international treaty instruments as they currently stand. This is a significant issue, as anecdotal evidence suggests there is the potential for widespread cross-border transport scenarios, particularly in Europe.
Crediting CO2 Sequestration – An Alternative Approach to Integrating CCS Into the EU ETS
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (1/2009)
European power supply is largely based on fossil energy resources. The combustion of fossil fuels releases significant amounts of carbon dioxide CO2), however, which in turn contributes to a great extent to the greenhouse effect and climate change. In order to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions of the energy sector and other energy-intensive industries, the European Community introduced an emissions trading scheme (EU ETS) on the European level based on the European Emissions Trading Directive 2008/87/EC.
Litigating the NAP: Legal Challenges for the Emissions Trading Scheme of the European Union
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (10/2010)
There has been a sharp increase in the amount of litigation regarding the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme in recent years. Cases revolve mainly around the limits of the Commission’s discretion in reviewing National Allocation Plans (NAPs).
Subsidizing Carbon Capture and Storage Demonstration through the EU ETS New Entrants Reserve: A Proportionality Test
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (10/2010)
Upon its adoption in the Directive revising the European Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading Scheme (Directive 2009/29), Article 10(a)8 was heavily criticized by a number of environmental organizations and legal scholars for disturbing the EU ETS’ market mechanism.
