Increasingly there is a need to determine methane emission rates from landfills. These determinations are needed for greenhouse gas inventories, for constraining estimates of emissions of non-methane organic compounds and for determining the efficiency of gas collection systems. Measurement campaigns to determine methane emissions from landfills are not overly common although a number of studies have been published, frequently using static chambers as a measurement vehicle (Bogner et al., 1997a, b, 1993). The disadvantage of this approach is that it is time consuming and requires a large number of measurements to constrain estimates from large landfill surfaces. The chamber approach also will not detect emissions from above the soil surface which might be due to leaky gas plumbing fixtures.
A comparison of two approaches for the measurement of methane emissions from landfills was conducted. An optical remote sensing tunable diode laser approach was compared with static chambers placed on a grid at a landfill in north Florida, USA. The studied landfill is closed, with a synthetic geomembrane top liner overlain by 60 cm of well-vegetated clay. The landfill had an active gas extraction system. In addition to the gas wells, the geomembrane cover was penetrated by leachate circulation pipes. Methane emission was concentrated near these penetrations in the cover and was generally zero in soil covered areas away from these wells and pipes. The laser method yielded results between 17.7 to 35.4 g CH
Copyright: | © IWWG International Waste Working Group | |
Quelle: | Specialized Session F (Oktober 2007) | |
Seiten: | 8 | |
Preis inkl. MwSt.: | € 8,00 | |
Autor: | Jeff Chanton Gary Hater Dr. C. Douglas Goldsmith Roger B. Green Ph.D., P.E. Tarek Abichou | |
Artikel weiterleiten | In den Warenkorb legen | Artikel kommentieren |
A YEAR’S MONITORING OF A PASSIVE LANDFILL GAS BIOFILTER
© IWWG International Waste Working Group (10/2007)
In landfill rehabilitation programs, biogas management is a major issue. If biogas production is not sufficient for a flare to perform—methane concentration at an average of 30 % and biogas generation under 10 cubic metre per hour—, alternative solutions can be imagined. In particular, numerous writers have shown that it is possible to treat some of that methane by oxidation in the landfill cap or even by using a biofilter. This study takes a look at a French experimental site using this kind of landfill gas treatment.
DIFFUSED LANDFILL GAS EMISSION MONITORING IN NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE LANDFILLS: STUDY CASES
© IWWG International Waste Working Group (10/2007)
An articulated monitoring plan was arranged in order to set up an adequate measure campaign of the possible landfill gas escape from landfill body, with the aim of assuring scientific significance and coherence for the evaluation of vertical landfill gas emissions (i.e. from landfill surfaces in contact with atmosphere) and of horizontal landfill gas emissions (i.e. landfill gas migration through soil and subsoil toward the outside of landfill cultivation area).
OPERATIONAL FACTORS DETERMINING PERFORMANCE OF LANDFILL GAS PROJECTS UNDER KYOTO PROTOCOL MECHANISMS
© IWWG International Waste Working Group (10/2007)
Waste management is inevitably linked to carbon management since there is a direct relationship between the treatment and disposal of waste with certain emissions released to the atmosphere. The nature and amount of emissions depend on the method used. The threat of climate change has focussed attention on greenhouse gas production from waste disposal. Landfill is the oldest form of waste treatment due to its historical simplicity of ‘hide’ the waste. Undoubtedly, the concept of Reduce, Reuse and Recycle (3R) is the most sustainable waste management approach nowadays. However, the evolution from landfilling to the 3R concept is happening gradually and at different rates worldwide.
BIO-TARP: DEVELOPING A METHANOTROPHIC ALTERNATIVE DAILY COVER TO REDUCE LANDFILL METHANE EMISSIONS
© IWWG International Waste Working Group (10/2007)
Landfills are the largest source of anthropogenic CH4 emissions in the U.S. (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2007). Field data (unpublished) have shown that substantial CH4 generation and emissions can occur before engineered gas extraction is economically feasible. Methanotrophs are indigenous aerobic microorganisms in landfill cover soils that can oxidize CH4 and thereby provide a complementary biological mechanism to reduce emissions. Even though both landfill CH4 emissions and oxidation rates can vary by more than 6 orders of magnitude (Bogner, et al., 1997), field data have confirmed that methanotrophs are capable of substantial reductions in CH4 emissions in both conventional covers and engineered "biocovers" (Huber-Humer, 2004). In addition, methanotrophs are capable of reducing emissions of nonmethane hydrocarbons (Scheutz et al., 2003).
METHANE EMISSIONS MEASUREMENTS ON DIFFERENT LANDFILLS
© IWWG International Waste Working Group (10/2007)
The detection and quantification of methane emissions from landfills is an important matter from an operational and an environmental point of view. It enables an assessment of the efficiency of the covers and the collection systems to be made. This is essential for the optimisation of the landfill gas (LFG) collection and recovery. A direct consequence is the reduction of global methane emissions. Furthermore, the monitoring of methane emissions is essential for environmental reporting (EPER directive) and for greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction policies. It constitutes a potential lobbying tool and revenue when implicated in carbon credit projects.